Category: Careers Blog

Careers Blog, Engineering

AI Is Changing Software Engineering: Can We Trust the Code?

1. When Writing Code Is No Longer the Hardest Part

Speed is no longer the same as productivity

For decades, one of the natural constraints of software engineering was our ability to turn an idea into working code. Engineers had to research, design, write, debug, refactor, and try again. Today, with AI coding assistants and agents capable of producing entire implementations in minutes, something fundamental is shifting: generating code is becoming cheaper. Trusting it is not.

The adoption curve already tells part of the story. According to Stack Overflow’s 2025 Developer Survey, 84% of respondents are using or planning to use AI tools in their development process, while 51% of professional developers use them daily. Yet only 33% trust the accuracy of AI-generated output, compared with 46% who actively distrust it. AI adoption is accelerating faster than confidence in what it produces.

That gap reveals a new engineering bottleneck. The question is no longer simply, “Can we build this?” Increasingly, it is: “Can we prove quickly enough that what we just built is correct, secure, maintainable, and appropriate for the system it is about to enter?” Code generation is accelerating, but verification still requires engineering judgment.

And “almost correct” can be more dangerous than obviously wrong. Stack Overflow found that 66% of developers are frustrated by AI solutions that are nearly right but not quite, while 45% report that debugging AI-generated code can take more time. An AI tool may reduce the minutes required to produce a function while increasing the effort required to understand its consequences.

The shift can be summarized simply. Before: much of the work went into producing a solution and then reviewing it. Now: we may be able to generate five possible solutions before we have fully validated the first. That changes where an engineer’s value lives—from the mechanical ability to produce every line of code to the judgment required to decide which lines deserve to reach production.

2. The Real Engineering Work Begins After the Code Is Generated

From code output to evidence output

Software development has never been only about producing code. We build systems that process payments, protect information, coordinate operations, connect millions of people, power healthcare, support businesses, and increasingly influence real-world decisions. An elegant implementation that cannot be operated with confidence is still a poor engineering outcome.

That is why engineering teams may need to think beyond code output and start optimizing for evidence output. Tests, contracts, metrics, observability, threat models, architectural decisions, benchmarks, documentation, and production signals provide the evidence required to answer a more important question than “Does it work?”: “How do we know it works—and how will we know when it stops?”

Code review changes under this model as well. Reviewing a pull request should not be limited to catching syntax, formatting, or straightforward mistakes that automated tooling can already detect. A strong reviewer contributes something far more difficult to automate: context. Does this abstraction belong in the architecture? Are we duplicating an existing capability? What happens at the boundaries? What is the blast radius if it fails? Are we creating technical debt that someone else will inherit six months from now?

Tests alone do not create trust either. An AI agent can generate dozens of tests and still fail to verify the property that actually matters. The challenge is determining whether we are testing the right behavior, with representative data, under realistic conditions. Strict typing, contract testing, property-based testing, static analysis, security scanning, feature flags, canary deployments, SLOs, and strong observability are becoming less like “nice-to-have” practices and more like infrastructure for engineering trust.

A useful framework is to put every AI-accelerated change through four questions: Do we understand it? Can we prove it works? Can we observe it once it is running? Can we recover quickly if it fails? DORA’s 2025 research reinforces this systems view: AI acts as an amplifier, and the organizations seeing the strongest results are those investing not only in tools, but also in the technical foundations, culture, platforms, data, and practices around them.

3. For LATAM, the Opportunity Is Not to Produce More Code—It Is to Build More Trust

LATAM talent competes on engineering judgment, not geography alone

This transformation arrives at an important moment for LATAM talent. For years, much of the conversation around nearshore software development focused on convenient time zones, competitive costs, and access to skilled professionals. Those advantages still matter, but they no longer fully describe the role Latin American engineers can play inside global technology organizations.

The scale of the region’s developer community makes that increasingly clear. GitHub reported that LATAM added approximately 3.2 million developers between 2024 and 2025, with Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia among the region’s standout markets. Brazil alone reached approximately 6.89 million developers on GitHub, making it the platform’s fourth-largest developer community globally. For anyone watching the evolution of software development in Latin America, the region is no longer a secondary source of engineering capacity. It is becoming an important part of where global software is built.

The broader digital economy tells a similar story. According to a 2026 report from the World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, and World Trade Organization, Latin America and the Caribbean’s exports of digitally delivered services grew from roughly $18.5 billion in 2005 to $87.7 billion in 2024. The numbers reflect a region becoming increasingly connected to global demand for digital expertise, technology, and knowledge-based services.

But the opportunity is not to prove that an engineer in Costa Rica, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, or elsewhere in LATAM can generate code as quickly as someone in another market. AI is rapidly democratizing that kind of speed. The real differentiators will be deeper: understanding the business problem behind a ticket, challenging assumptions, communicating trade-offs, detecting risk, learning complex domains, collaborating across functions, and taking ownership of outcomes rather than tasks.

That is also where nearshore software development can evolve from a talent-access model into a deeply integrated engineering model. Meaningful working-hour overlap makes it possible to discuss architectural decisions while they are still being made, review incidents together, pair program across borders, challenge a requirement before it becomes code, and shorten the feedback loop between building, learning, and improving. In an AI-assisted engineering world, proximity may become less about logistics and more about building trust.

4. Trust Is Still Built Between People

Community, technical leadership, and engineering culture matter more than ever

Paradoxically, the more powerful our technology becomes at generating software, the more valuable some of the most human engineering practices become. Pair programming, thoughtful code reviews, mentoring, design reviews, architecture discussions, and postmortems work because they force an idea to survive more than one perspective. They are not ceremonies. They are distributed mechanisms for reducing risk inside a healthy developer community.

Consider a scenario that is becoming increasingly common. An engineer receives a task, uses AI to explore an unfamiliar codebase, and produces a convincing implementation in twenty minutes. The pull request could be opened immediately. Instead, the engineer asks a teammate why one seemingly awkward piece of logic has existed for years. The answer reveals an undocumented edge case tied to an important customer workflow. The second engineer’s greatest contribution was not writing code. It was contributing context, memory, and judgment.

That reality also changes technical leadership. The strongest engineering leaders will not necessarily be the people producing the most lines of code or mastering the largest collection of prompts. They will be the ones who teach teams to ask better questions, challenge plausible answers, establish effective guardrails, design systems with clear boundaries, and recognize when there is enough evidence to move forward. A mature tech culture does not punish uncertainty; it creates mechanisms for resolving it.

This is also the kind of engineering culture we continue to build at Mismo: professionals across LATAM working alongside international teams while remaining part of a real community of engineers. Technical growth does not happen only when someone solves a difficult problem. It also happens when a developer receives thoughtful feedback, mentors a teammate, shares lessons after an incident, collaborates across countries, or feels confident enough to challenge a technical decision. Technology connects our repositories. Trust connects the people building them.

Perhaps that is the most exciting part of this new chapter in software engineering. If writing code is no longer our scarcest resource, we can invest more of our energy in what has always defined exceptional engineers: understanding problems deeply, learning continuously, protecting quality, sharing knowledge, collaborating generously, and taking responsibility for what we build. As developers across Latin America, our greatest opportunity is not to prove that we can produce more code than anyone else. It is to help build the next generation of global software—and make it software people can actually trust.

Careers Blog, Talent Spotlight, Women in STEM

Mary Alvarez: Woman in QA Engineering

Mismo thrives on the strength of its exceptional team. We provide top-tier remote software development teams that seamlessly integrate with companies worldwide, driving exceptional results. Many organizations have partnered with Mismo to augment their development capabilities and achieve their technology goals.

At the heart of these successful teams are the talented individuals who make Mismo what it is. We’re committed to celebrating our remarkable employees and their invaluable contributions to our company culture. Our employee spotlights showcase the genuine relationships we’ve forged with team members and clients, highlighting their dedication and the positive impact they have on our collaborative environment.

  • Tell us a little about yourself
    I’m Mary Alvarez, a Quality Assurance Engineer with a passion for ensuring software reliability, performance, and a seamless user experience. At Mismo, I focus on implementing robust testing frameworks, automated QA processes, and continuous integration practices to help deliver high-quality products. 
  • What initially attracted you to engineering and how have you found inspiration in this career?
    I was drawn to engineering by a natural curiosity for problem-solving and a desire to understand how complex systems work under the hood. In QA engineering, I find inspiration in advocating for the end user—identifying edge cases, preventing issues before they reach production, and collaborating across teams to deliver seamless software experiences. 
  • What innovation or technical advancement have you been a part of that you consider to have made a milestone in your engineering field?
    During my time as a QA Engineer, one of my major milestones has been leading the integration of automated end-to-end (E2E) regression testing pipelines directly into CI/CD workflows. Transitioning client projects from manual testing to automated, scalable test suites significantly reduced release cycle times and increased confidence in software delivery. 
  • What made you choose Mismo?
    I chose Mismo because of its commitment to connecting Latin American talent with leading global companies, as well as its strong culture of continuous learning and professional support. The opportunity to contribute to diverse, impactful client projects while being supported by a collaborative team made Mismo the ideal place to grow my career in QA. 
  • How would you describe the work environment at Mismo?
    The work environment at Mismo is supportive, flexible, and highly collaborative. Even when working remotely with high-impact client teams, you still feel connected to a community that values work-life balance, professional growth, and mutual support. 
  • What learning and development opportunities have you had at Mismo and how have you utilized these opportunities to grow as a professional?
    Mismo has provided me with fantastic opportunities to adapt and expand my skill set by matching me with different client projects. Transitioning to my second project allowed me to broaden my experience across new tech stacks, industry domains, and testing frameworks, making me a more versatile QA Engineer. 
  • What is your personal vision of a future where gender equity is a reality in all organizations, including Mismo?
    My vision is an engineering landscape where women are equally represented in technical leadership and architectural decision-making roles. Greater gender equity creates space for diverse perspectives, fostering more creative problem-solving and more inclusive product development across the industry. 
  • What aspects of working at Mismo’s engineering team make you proud and motivate you in your daily tasks?
    I’m proud of the high caliber of talent and professionalism across our engineering team. Seeing how seamlessly our engineers integrate into global client workflows and consistently deliver top-tier technical quality motivates me every day. 
  • How do you believe the company and engineering can positively impact the world, people’s lives, and make a difference in their respective industries?
    Engineering builds the infrastructure that supports modern life. By helping ensure that software is reliable, secure, and accessible, QA engineering directly impacts how smoothly businesses operate and how seamlessly people interact with digital tools in their everyday lives. 
  • What Mismo policies or practices have helped you improve your work-life balance?
    Mismo’s remote-first culture and emphasis on flexible working hours have made a significant difference in my experience. Having the trust and autonomy to manage my time effectively allows me to deliver high-quality work while maintaining a healthy balance in my personal life. 
  • What inspiring advice would you give to someone considering a career in engineering or looking to join a company like Mismo?
    Embrace continuous learning, and never be afraid to ask questions. Technology evolves rapidly, so adaptability is one of your greatest assets. In QA especially, cultivating a mindset of curiosity and user advocacy can make all the difference. 
  • What tools or technologies do you use most frequently in your daily work as an engineer at Mismo?
    I frequently use test automation and management tools such as Playwright and JavaScript, Postman for API testing, Jira for issue tracking, Git and GitHub for version control, and CI/CD tools and practices. On top of all of these, AI tools such as Claude and ChatGPT have become an important part of my workflow.
Careers Blog, Engineering

When Your Home Becomes Your Office: The Invisible Cost of Remote Work

There is a strange moment many developers know all too well. It is 6:37 p.m. You merged your last pull request, answered your final Slack message, and your calendar says the workday is over. You stand up from your desk, walk a few steps, and arrive at… your living room. Or your kitchen. Or the same bedroom where you have been working since eight in the morning.

Technically, you have left work. But your mind has not.

While making dinner, you remember a possible cause of the bug you were investigating. When you sit down to watch a show, you wonder whether you should have challenged a decision made during the architecture review. You pick up your phone to answer a personal message and notice a notification from the team. “I’ll just check what happened,” you tell yourself. Ten minutes later, you are reading logs again.

Not necessarily because anyone asked you to. And not because you dislike remote work. Often, the opposite is true: you enjoy what you do, you have autonomy, you are solving interesting problems, and you can work from a place you chose. But when the same space is where we think, produce, rest, eat, and unwind, our brains lose some of the boundaries they relied on for decades to distinguish one part of life from another.

There used to be fairly clear signals. Close the laptop. Take the elevator. Leave the building. Walk to the car. Get on the bus. Listen to music during the commute. Arrive home. Even when commuting was exhausting, it contained something many people have had to deliberately rebuild in remote work: a transition.

And that transition matters especially in software engineering, because our work rarely ends at the exact moment our hands leave the keyboard.

The Workday Ends on the Screen Long Before It Ends in Our Heads

Software development requires us to hold an enormous amount of mental context at once. We are not simply completing tasks. We are understanding systems, anticipating behavior, remembering previous decisions, interpreting code written by other people, comparing trade-offs, and building mental models of things we cannot physically see.

A backend engineer might spend an afternoon investigating why an operation that works perfectly in staging starts failing under a specific load in production. A QA engineer may finish the day thinking about an edge case no one included in the acceptance criteria. A DevOps engineer may go to bed wondering whether the alert they chose not to escalate was really just noise. An engineering manager may continue replaying a difficult conversation with someone on their team.

You can close the code. You cannot always close the intellectual problem.

That is one reason working from home can feel paradoxically comfortable and exhausting at the same time. We eliminated commutes, gained autonomy, and acquired more control over our routines. But we also lost many of the small environmental cues that once helped the brain recognize that one part of the day was over.

After several years of remote work, the challenge is no longer simply proving that we can be productive from home. Distributed teams around the world have already done that. The more interesting challenge now is different: how do we build sustainable remote careers without turning our entire lives into an extension of the workday?

In 2025, Microsoft described a phenomenon it called the infinite workday: a workday that begins extending into the early morning and continues resurfacing at night through meetings, messages, documents, and notifications. The problem is not simply working long hours. It is the feeling that work is permanently available, waiting for us to log back in.

For a developer, that availability has a particular characteristic: there is always something else we could do.

We could review that PR tonight so a teammate does not have to wait tomorrow. We could quickly answer the question that came in after hours. We could use twenty minutes to research that library. We could get ahead on the ticket. We could fix that small thing that “only takes five minutes.”

And each of those decisions, viewed in isolation, seems perfectly reasonable.

The problem begins when the exception slowly becomes the architecture of our routine.

Good software has taught us for years that systems need boundaries. We define interfaces. We isolate responsibilities. We control dependencies. We avoid giving one component unrestricted access to everything. And yet, sometimes we design our own workdays exactly the way we would try to avoid designing a production system: everything connected to everything, permanently available, with no clear boundary between contexts.

Paradoxically, the solution is usually not forcing ourselves to work fewer hours or building the perfect Instagram-worthy home office. For many people, those recommendations are not even realistic. Maybe the desk is in the bedroom. Maybe the apartment is shared. Perhaps the dining table serves as a workspace during the day and, two hours later, becomes exactly what it was meant to be: a table for eating.

That is why it can be far more useful to think about transitions than perfect spaces.

Imagine a developer working from a small apartment in Bogotá. Her desk is in her bedroom because there is no other room available. For months, when the workday ended, she simply closed the laptop and left it on the desk. Every time she entered the bedroom, she saw the screen, the headphones, the notebook, and a list of unfinished tasks next to the bed. Work was over, but it remained visually present.

Then she changed one thing. Before finishing for the day, she wrote down what she had been working on, what she had discovered, and the exact next step for the following morning. Then she closed every application, put the laptop in a drawer, and walked around the block for fifteen minutes.

Nothing sophisticated.

But she had created an ending.

That small ritual solved two problems. First, she no longer needed to keep mentally rehearsing where she had left off because she had externalized the context. Second, the walk created a physical transition between two states that otherwise would have taken place within the same few square meters.

Another engineer might do something completely different. Maybe he works from the dining table in San José and cannot leave his setup there. At the end of the day, he disconnects the monitor, puts away the keyboard and mouse, changes the lighting, and starts making dinner. For someone else, the ritual might be quitting Slack completely. For another person, it could be changing clothes, walking the dog, working out, or putting on music while making coffee.

There is no universal ritual. The important idea is to create a signal consistent enough for the brain to learn: this is over.

That also changes how we think about productivity. Engineering has a long-standing culture that sometimes confuses visible effort with impact. Long hours. Fast replies. Constant availability. But an exhausted developer can produce more lines of code while making worse decisions.

After five hours spent trying to solve a problem, pushing for another two does not always demonstrate commitment. Sometimes the technically smarter move is to document what you learned, write down the remaining hypotheses, and come back tomorrow with a cognitive system that has had a chance to reset.

We have all experienced some version of this. A problem defeats us for hours, we walk away from the desk frustrated, and the solution appears while we are showering, walking, cooking, or doing something seemingly unrelated to programming.

It was not magic.

Our minds needed to stop looking at the problem from exactly the same angle.

Rest is part of the engineering process too.

LATAM Is Building Global Technology. That Should Not Mean Being Available Globally

This conversation takes on another dimension when we talk about LATAM tech talent.

Over the past several years, thousands of engineers from Costa Rica, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Mexico, Guatemala, and other countries have become increasingly integrated into international teams. The growth of software development in Latin America is changing who builds global products and, just as importantly, where those products are built.

GitHub reported that Latin America added approximately 3.2 million net new developers between 2024 and 2025. Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia are among the ecosystems continuing to gain relevance, driven by more mature technical communities, continuous learning, greater access to international opportunities, and the expansion of distributed work models.

Today, it is completely normal for an engineer in Medellín to review code written by someone in California, for a developer in Buenos Aires to work on a platform used by millions of people in the United States, or for a DevOps engineer in Costa Rica to participate in an infrastructure decision with colleagues distributed across several countries.

That represents an extraordinary opportunity for our region.

For years, participating in certain international technology projects seemed to require physically relocating to another country. Today, an engineer can live in LATAM and contribute directly to products, architectures, and decisions with global impact. Nearshore software development has helped remove many of those barriers.

But that opportunity can also create a quiet pressure.

When you work with an international company, it is easy to start proving commitment through availability. Reply quickly. Always adapt. Always be present. Become “the reliable person,” the one everyone knows they can message because you will probably respond.

And that behavior is often celebrated at first.

The person who always replies looks incredibly committed. The one who resolves incidents after hours quickly becomes indispensable. The person who constantly accepts meetings demonstrates flexibility. The one who never seems to disconnect becomes known as someone who is always there.

Until what looked like an advantage begins turning into dependency.

A strong nearshore software development model should not work because an engineer in LATAM is willing to extend the workday indefinitely. It should work because there are clear processes, highly skilled talent, intelligent time-zone overlap, effective communication, solid documentation, and trust.

The real value of nearshore was never having people available for longer.

It is having the right people working nearby, collaborating deeply, and making strong technical decisions.

That distinction should matter to CTOs, VPs of Engineering, and engineering managers too.

If a team requires individual hyperavailability to function, it probably does not have an engagement problem. It has an organizational design problem.

Documentation may be missing. Too much knowledge may be concentrated in a handful of people. Priorities may be unclear. Almost everything may be labeled urgent. Meetings may consume the hours meant for concentration, forcing engineers to do their actual work only after the calls finally end.

A developer who is coding after six is not necessarily demonstrating how much they love their job.

Maybe they simply spent the entire day talking about the work they needed to do.

That is why protecting deep-work blocks, defining what constitutes a genuine emergency, normalizing asynchronous responses, and respecting time-zone differences are not merely well-being initiatives. They are organizational architecture decisions.

Tech culture is written this way too.

It is written when a senior engineer says during a code review, “I don’t understand this part. Can you explain it?” and shows that asking questions does not diminish expertise.

It is written when someone shares a problem before spending six hours trying to prove they can solve it alone.

It is written when a manager avoids sending unnecessary messages at ten at night or, if they need to because that is when they work, makes it clear that no immediate response is expected.

It is written when someone takes vacation and nobody needs to call them because knowledge has been properly distributed.

And above all, it is written through the small behaviors a team eventually learns to consider normal.

Building Great Teams Also Means Building Lives With Room for More Than Work

There is an old image of the great programmer: isolated, completely absorbed in the problem, working for hours until a brilliant solution appears.

Modern software engineering works differently.

The best systems are products of collaboration. Pair programming. Architecture discussions. Code reviews. Mentoring. Documentation. Respectful disagreement. People saying, “I don’t know,” and someone else helping them figure it out.

A strong developer community does more than make us better technically. It also keeps us from individually carrying burdens that should belong to the team.

Imagine an engineer who has been stuck for four hours trying to solve a concurrency problem. They have read the documentation, run tests, reviewed logs, and changed the implementation several times. They begin to feel that asking for help would amount to admitting that they should already know how to solve it.

Eventually, they share their screen with a colleague.

She asks three questions.

Within twenty minutes, they discover they had spent hours investigating the wrong component.

That moment contains a technical lesson, but also a cultural one: collaboration should not appear only after we have failed individually; it should be a normal part of how we practice engineering.

The same is true of learning. Stack Overflow’s 2025 Developer Survey found that around 69% of developers had spent time during the previous year learning new programming techniques or a new language. It is difficult to think of many professions where constant reinvention is such an explicit part of everyday work.

Now add AI. New frameworks. Tools appearing every week. Cloud platforms that evolve constantly. New expectations around cybersecurity, data, automation, and product thinking. Beyond writing code, we increasingly expect judgment, validation, communication, ownership, and business understanding.

The sustainable answer cannot simply be to consume more information for more hours.

We also need room to process it.

That is why a mature engineering culture should ask not only “How can we produce more?” but also “What conditions will allow our people to keep doing great engineering five years from now?”

Because technical retention does not begin only when someone starts considering another job offer.

It begins much earlier.

It begins with how someone feels on an ordinary Tuesday after closing their laptop.

Whether they still have energy.

Whether they still feel curious.

Whether they can make a mistake without feeling that they are proving their incompetence.

Whether they can ask for help.

Whether they have room to learn.

Whether they can disconnect without worrying that something important will happen because they stopped checking Slack for two hours.

At Mismo, this conversation carries particular meaning because working with engineers distributed throughout LATAM means building community without relying on a shared physical office. It means creating closeness among people who may live thousands of miles apart, sharing knowledge across countries, learning from different experiences, and building trust through the work itself.

But community should not exist only within a company.

Something bigger is happening across our region.

A generation of Latin American developers is proving that we do not necessarily need to move to Silicon Valley to participate in global products. We can build them from our own cities, contribute ideas shaped by our own realities, and work alongside some of the best teams in the world without necessarily giving up what we value about our lives.

That deserves pride.

And it deserves protection too.

Because flexibility loses part of its meaning if we work from home but never truly feel that we are at home.

Perhaps that is why the most important conversation about the future of remote work is no longer about how many days we should spend in an office, which tool we should use to communicate, or which country we should hire from.

Perhaps it is a much more human question:

How do we want to feel after many years of working this way?

We want to remain curious when a difficult problem appears. We want to have the energy to learn a new technology. We want to keep enjoying technical conversations with people who know things we do not. We want to build software we can be proud of.

But we also want to close the laptop.

Go outside.

Walk.

Have dinner without checking Slack.

Be present with the people we love.

Sleep without continuing to mentally debug our professional lives.

And come back the next day wanting to build again.

Because being a great developer should never mean being available all the time. It means developing judgment, continuously learning, collaborating generously, and understanding when to keep searching for a solution… and when to put the problem away until tomorrow.

From LATAM, we are helping build a new chapter of global technology.

And at Mismo, that vision comes to life every day through distributed teams, cross-country collaboration, and a culture where professional growth should not require sacrificing what makes a long-term career sustainable.

Because building great products also means building environments where engineers can learn, share knowledge, take on meaningful challenges, and feel part of a community—even when each person is working from a different city, country, or home.

For us, remote work is not simply about connecting from anywhere. It is about creating the conditions for LATAM talent to do high-level engineering, collaborate with global teams, and continue developing professionally without losing sight of something essential: behind every commit, every architecture decision, and every product, there is a person.

That is also the community we want to keep building at Mismo: one where technical talent has room to grow, where great ideas can come from anywhere in LATAM, and where doing great work still leaves room for a great life outside of work.

Because our region is already helping build the future of technology.

Now we also have the opportunity to build a more human and sustainable way of working within it.

Careers Blog, Talent Spotlight

Meet Martín Acosta: Engineering from Patagonia to the World

Mismo thrives on the strength of its exceptional team. We provide top-tier remote software development teams that seamlessly integrate with companies worldwide, driving exceptional results. Many organizations have partnered with Mismo to augment their development capabilities and achieve their technology goals.

At the heart of these successful teams are the talented individuals who make Mismo what it is. We’re committed to celebrating our remarkable employees and their invaluable contributions to our company culture. Our employee spotlights showcase the genuine relationships we’ve forged with team members and clients, highlighting their dedication and the positive impact they have on our collaborative environment.

  • Tell us a little about yourself: I’m Martín Acosta, a graduate Analyst Programmer and Senior JavaScript/TypeScript Developer based in Playa Unión, Chubut, Argentina, with over 15 years of experience in the IT industry. I work remotely, providing IT services to international clients. Outside of programming, I enjoy staying active and spend my free time surfing, snowboarding, and brewing specialty coffee.

  • What initially attracted you to engineering and how have you found inspiration in this career? When I was 14 years old, I started exploring computers and building small applications. That was when I knew I wanted to become a programmer. Using my first Linux operating system was one of my earliest sources of inspiration. Today, after many years in the IT industry, I still find that same inspiration in building efficient software and working on new side projects.

  • What innovation or technical advancement have you been a part of that you consider to have made a milestone in your engineering field? Contributing to decentralized P2P systems and developing AI-powered RAG solutions for document processing that help streamline complex operational workflows.
  • What made you choose Mismo? Mismo is a great fit for my career as a remote senior developer. It allows me to apply my years of experience to strong engineering projects while maintaining the lifestyle I value in Patagonia.
  • How would you describe the work environment at Mismo? It offers flexibility and truly respects remote work, giving me the autonomy to manage my time, focus on writing clean code, and consistently deliver reliable results.

  • What learning and development opportunities have you had at Mismo and how have you utilized these opportunities to grow as a professional? I’ve had the opportunity to integrate AI into my daily workflow. Learning how to use AI tools has helped me improve the way I work, strengthen my skills, and become more efficient at writing code and solving problems every day.

  • What aspects of working at Mismo’s engineering team make you proud and motivate you in your daily tasks? I value the focus on building robust, reliable software. Having the space to design efficient backend architectures and write clean, maintainable code keeps me motivated and engaged every day.

  • How do you believe the company and engineering can positively impact the world, people’s lives, and make a difference in their respective industries? Good engineering solves real-world operational problems and helps automate complex tasks. By building reliable tools and platforms, we can make businesses and everyday digital experiences more efficient.

  • What Mismo policies or practices have helped you improve your work-life balance? The remote flexibility. It allows me to do my job well while still having time for myself.
  • What inspiring advice would you give to someone considering a career in engineering or looking to join a company like Mismo? Focus on building strong computer science fundamentals, master your core tools, and never stop creating—whether through open-source contributions or personal side projects.
  • What tools or technologies do you use most frequently in your daily work as an engineer at Mismo? JavaScript, TypeScript, Node.js, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB.

Careers Blog, Engineering

Are You Growing as an Engineer—or Just Closing Tickets?

The Question That Never Appears in the Sprint

Some weeks, you complete ten tickets, reduce the backlog, and join every daily stand-up with an impressive list of accomplishments. From the outside, everything suggests that you are growing. Yet, at the end of the sprint, an uncomfortable question may remain: Am I becoming a better engineer, or have I simply learned to work faster?

The difference is not always reflected in Jira, pull request counts, or logged hours. Growth in software engineering means developing judgment, understanding problems more deeply, and improving the quality of the decisions you make before writing a single line of code.

Completing More Tickets Does Not Always Mean Moving Forward

Tickets are necessary. They organize work, distribute responsibilities, and turn product needs into concrete actions. The problem begins when they become the only measure of an engineer’s contribution.

You can complete a large number of tasks without understanding the system, questioning decisions, or participating in problem definition. You can also close fewer tickets while eliminating a recurring source of failure, improving an architecture, or helping the team make a decision that prevents months of rework.

The Shift May Look Like This

  • Before: You receive a predefined solution and implement it.
  • After: You investigate the problem and propose alternatives.
  • Before: You fix the same type of issue repeatedly.
  • After: You identify and eliminate the root cause.
  • Before: You optimize only your own delivery.
  • After: You improve the entire team’s ability to deliver.

Sign 1: You Are Asking Better Questions

A growing engineer does not necessarily have every answer. They have better questions. Before beginning a task, they ask who needs the functionality, what behavior is expected, which constraints exist, and what might happen when the system scales.

As you grow, you stop asking only, “How should I implement this?” and begin asking, “Why are we building this?”, “What risk are we accepting?” and “Is there a simpler solution?” That transition shows that you are moving from executing instructions to exercising technical judgment.

Sign 2: You Understand the Impact, Not Just the Code

Software development creates value when it solves real problems. An API is not simply a collection of endpoints. It may be the infrastructure that allows someone to access healthcare, complete a payment, manage their finances, or find a professional opportunity.

Growth means understanding the connection between code, product, and user. When you understand the desired outcome, you can make better decisions about performance, accessibility, security, maintainability, and user experience. Your code stops being an isolated deliverable and becomes an intentional part of the product.

Sign 3: You Think in Systems and Consequences

Speed may make you efficient, but systems thinking makes you dependable. A more mature engineer considers how a change may affect other layers of the application, which dependencies it introduces, and what its operational cost could be six months from now.

Technical maturity also requires recognizing trade-offs. There is no perfect architecture and no technology that is right for every context. There is only a decision that is appropriate for a specific problem, supported by clear assumptions and a thoughtful understanding of its consequences.

Growing as an Engineer in the Age of AI

This distinction has become even more important in an environment where producing code is increasingly fast. AI tools can accelerate implementation, documentation, testing, and debugging, but they do not automatically provide product understanding, architectural judgment, or accountability.

Producing more code does not guarantee that teams are building better systems. The real advantage appears when engineers use technology to strengthen their capabilities: reducing repetitive work, testing assumptions faster, improving feedback loops, and dedicating more attention to the decisions that require human context.

Community Accelerates the Growth Tickets Cannot Measure

Nobody becomes an exceptional engineer entirely on their own. Pair programming, code reviews, mentoring, and architecture conversations reveal blind spots that rarely become visible when the only goal is completing a task.

A developer may remember for years the person who taught them to investigate an incident without looking for someone to blame, justify a technical decision, or write code review feedback with empathy. That kind of learning strengthens a developer community and creates a technology culture in which knowledge is not accumulated by a few people. It circulates.

Lessons That Demonstrate Real Growth

  • Explain a decision without hiding behind technical jargon.
  • Receive feedback without turning the conversation into a personal defense.
  • Review code in search of clarity, not superiority.
  • Document knowledge to reduce dependency on specific individuals.
  • Share context before presenting conclusions.

Technical Leadership Begins Before the Title

Technical leadership does not begin when someone receives the title of Tech Lead. It begins when a person improves the quality of team conversations, shares relevant information, and helps others move forward without trying to control every decision.

It also appears when someone acknowledges that they do not know something, asks for support early, or protects the team from a seemingly fast solution that could create unnecessary technical debt. Leadership is not proving that you are the smartest person in the meeting. It is increasing the collective capability of the team.

The Strength of LATAM Talent in Global Technology

LATAM talent is participating in a global technology industry that continues to expand rapidly. Across the region, engineers are contributing to open-source ecosystems, developing global platforms, scaling infrastructure, and solving complex problems for organizations around the world.

This momentum did not appear overnight. The continued growth of developer communities in countries such as Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, Mexico, Costa Rica, Chile, Peru, and Guatemala demonstrates that software development in Latin America is not a peripheral trend. It is becoming an increasingly important force within the global technology economy.

Nearshore Should Not Mean Working From the Periphery

For years, part of the conversation around nearshore software development focused primarily on cost efficiencies, compatible time zones, and operational convenience. While these factors remain relevant, they do not fully explain the value that Latin American engineers bring to international products.

Global teams do not simply need professionals who are available during convenient working hours. They need engineers who can understand complex contexts, communicate clearly, challenge assumptions, adapt quickly, and take ownership of outcomes. That is where the creativity, resilience, and continuous learning demonstrated by LATAM talent become a strategic advantage.

How to Measure Growth Without Relying on the Backlog

To determine whether you are growing, observe the problems you can now address, the conversations in which you participate, and the amount of context you need to make a responsible decision. Consider whether your work reduces uncertainty, makes other people more effective, and improves the long-term sustainability of the system.

A valuable practice is to review your progress every quarter. Do not measure only the technologies you learned or the tickets you completed. Ask yourself which decisions you can make today that you would have delegated six months ago, which mistakes you have stopped repeating, and how many people you helped develop a new skill.

Technical Growth Checklist

  • Do I understand the business behind the product more clearly?
  • Can I explain the trade-offs behind my decisions?
  • Do I identify risks before they become incidents?
  • Do I help other developers work more effectively?
  • Am I solving increasingly ambiguous problems?
  • Does my work leave the system in a better condition?

Building a Culture Where Engineers Can Grow

At Mismo, we believe a career in engineering should not become an endless sequence of tasks. Growth happens when engineers from different countries can share experiences, collaborate with global teams, and contribute to products whose impact extends far beyond their own region.

In a culture built around genuine collaboration, developers feel valued not only for what they deliver, but also for the questions they ask, the knowledge they share, and the way they help others grow. That is the kind of community we continue to strengthen: close, diverse, technically ambitious, and deeply human.

We Are Building What Comes Next

The future of engineering will not necessarily belong to those who generate the most lines of code or close the most tickets. It will belong to those who can transform technology into responsible solutions, understand complex systems, collaborate across differences, and continue learning even as tools and frameworks change.

We are a generation of developers across Latin America building the future from different cities, cultures, and experiences. Growth means recognizing that power, sharing it with others, and using every project not only to deliver software, but to become the engineers the global technology industry needs.

Careers Blog, Talent Spotlight

Ignacio Villalobos: QA Excellence at Mismo

Mismo thrives on the strength of its exceptional team. We provide top-tier remote software development teams that seamlessly integrate with companies worldwide, driving exceptional results. Many organizations have partnered with Mismo to augment their development capabilities and achieve their technology goals.

At the heart of these successful teams are the talented individuals who make Mismo what it is. We’re committed to celebrating our remarkable employees and their invaluable contributions to our company culture. Our employee spotlights showcase the genuine relationships we’ve forged with team members and clients, highlighting their dedication and the positive impact they have on our collaborative environment.

  • Tell us a little about yourself: I consider myself highly proactive and detail-oriented, which allows me to identify potential issues early and help ensure high-quality results. I also have strong communication skills and enjoy collaborating with developers and other team members to improve processes and deliver better products. I’m always willing to support the team and contribute wherever needed, while continuously looking for opportunities to learn and grow in my role.

  • What initially attracted you to engineering and how have you found inspiration in this career? I was initially drawn to engineering because I enjoy solving problems and understanding how systems work. As a QA Engineer, I’ve found purpose in ensuring product quality and advocating for the user experience. I especially enjoy collaborating with teams, identifying opportunities for improvement, and continuously expanding my knowledge in this field.

  • What innovation or technical advancement have you been a part of that you consider to have made a milestone in your engineering field? I contributed to improving internal QA processes and communication, particularly on financial and insurance projects. By ensuring greater data clarity and more thorough validation, we reduced errors, helped prevent potential customer loss and financial impact, and improved overall product quality.
  • What made you choose Mismo? I saw it as a company with a strong impact, known for delivering high-quality technology services and offering excellent opportunities for personal and professional growth. Now that I’m part of the company, I can confidently confirm that this is truly the case.
  • How would you describe the work environment at Mismo? I would describe the work environment as collaborative, supportive, and centered on continuous improvement. There is a strong emphasis on communication, which makes it easier to align on goals and consistently deliver high-quality results. I also value the openness to feedback and the opportunities for both professional and personal growth. Overall, it is a positive environment where people are always willing to support one another and work toward shared objectives.
  • What learning and development opportunities have you had at Mismo and how have you utilized these opportunities to grow as a professional? I have gained valuable experience working on direct-to-consumer genetic testing projects, which has helped me strengthen my QA skills while improving processes and communication. These opportunities have also allowed me to become more proactive, detail-oriented, and focused on consistently delivering high-quality results.

  • What aspects of working at Mismo’s engineering team make you proud and motivate you in your daily tasks? I feel proud of the strong collaboration and commitment to quality within the engineering team. I’m inspired by the impact our work has on clients across every project. Knowing that my contributions lead to higher quality, fewer errors, and more user-friendly applications keeps me engaged and motivated each day.

  • How do you believe the company and engineering can positively impact the world, people’s lives, and make a difference in their respective industries? Each product and application serves a purpose and contributes to improving people’s lives in different ways. High-quality engineers build high-quality products, and I believe Mismo strongly supports and enables that. Being part of the company allows us to contribute to meaningful client projects that develop tools designed to enhance the user experience, increase efficiency, and improve overall quality of life. In this way, the engineering team can make a positive impact on both users and the industries we serve.
  • What Mismo policies or practices have helped you improve your work-life balance? Mismo’s culture of trust has greatly improved my work-life balance. Being able to manage my schedule and focus on results rather than strict working hours allows me to remain productive while still making time for my personal life.
  • What inspiring advice would you give to someone considering a career in engineering or looking to join a company like Mismo? My advice is to stay proactive and remain open to continuous learning. Strong communication and collaboration are also essential in engineering. I would encourage others to take ownership of their work and embrace opportunities to contribute to meaningful projects that create a real impact.

  • What tools or technologies do you use most frequently in your daily work as an engineer at Mismo? Jira, Figma, Slack, Google Sheets, Google Docs, and web and mobile applications for testing.
Careers Blog, Engineering

LATAM Tech Talent: The Home Office as a Personal OS

A New Question for Those Who Build Software

Every developer knows the feeling: opening the editor, looking at a seemingly small task, and realizing there is a product decision behind it, a person waiting for a solution, and a system that must keep running even when no one is watching. In software engineering, the work has never been just about writing code; it is also about thinking clearly, sustaining quality under pressure, and learning faster than change itself.

For LATAM talent, that question carries an additional layer: how do we build global technology from Costa Rica, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, or any corner of our region without losing our identity, community, or sense of purpose?

The Value of Software Development Beyond Code

From Shipping Tickets to Designing Impact

A closed ticket may look like a small unit of work, but in reality, it can be an improvement that reduces friction for thousands of users, an integration that prevents operational errors, or an architectural decision that allows a product to scale without breaking.

The difference between “doing software” and practicing software engineering lies in intention. It is not about moving tasks from one column to another; it is about understanding trade-offs, anticipating failure, protecting the user experience, and building solutions that can survive the next sprint.

The Quiet Pride of Being a Developer

There is a very specific kind of pride in this craft: solving something no one else could see, refactoring a critical part of the system without making noise, leaving a codebase better than we found it, and knowing that quality is also a form of respect.

That is why the home office cannot be reduced to having a comfortable chair or a good internet connection. For a developer, the remote workspace is a personal operating system where focus, energy, communication, documentation, learning, and healthy boundaries all run together.

The Home Office as a Personal Operating System

A personal operating system is not a rigid routine. It is a conscious way of designing the day to think better: when to do deep work, when to collaborate, when to review pull requests, when to ask for help, and when to disconnect so we can come back with more clarity.

Remote work was once perceived as distance. Today, when designed well, it can become a technical advantage: fewer unnecessary interruptions, more autonomy, clearer documentation, more intentional conversations, and a more mature relationship with time.

Three lessons consistently show up in strong remote teams: autonomy needs context, flexibility needs agreements, and trust needs visibility. Without these three elements, the home office can become isolation. With them, it becomes sustainable performance.

The Strength of LATAM Talent and Its Global Impact

The global conversation around nearshore software development is no longer only about cost or time zone alignment. Increasingly, it is about technical quality, resilience, creativity, learning agility, and cultural proximity with teams building complex products for international markets.

CBRE noted in its 2025 Scoring Tech Talent report that Latin America’s tech talent has become increasingly focused on software development and innovation, and that the region’s tech workforce has grown significantly over the past five years. GitHub also reported in its 2025 Octoverse that more than six developers from LATAM were joining the platform every minute.

That growth matters because software development in Latin America is no longer a peripheral alternative. It is becoming part of the operating system of global companies that need agile teams, real-time communication, and technical judgment close to product decisions.

A recent study on global software development found that nearshore models can support overall project success, quality, timeline performance, lower management effort, and fewer communication issues, especially in agile or highly collaborative projects.

Community, Collaboration, and Continuous Learning

No One Grows Alone in a Strong Codebase

A developer community is built through small moments: a pair programming session where someone explains a decision with patience, a code review that teaches without humiliating, mentorship that unlocks confidence, or an honest conversation about technical debt before it turns into cultural debt.

Human technical leadership understands that excellence is not imposed through authority. It is cultivated by creating environments where asking questions is not seen as weakness, receiving feedback does not feel like a threat, and sharing knowledge is part of the work, not an extra task.

In 2025, Stack Overflow reported more than 49,000 responses from developers across 177 countries in its Developer Survey, with clear signs of a profession in transition: 84% of respondents use or plan to use AI tools, while 66% feel frustrated with “almost right” AI solutions, reminding us that learning is still more important than outsourcing judgment.

Mismo Culture: A Real Community Built for Global Impact

In a technology culture like Mismo’s, remote work is not understood as people sitting separately in front of screens. It is about building distributed teams with real cohesion, shared clarity, and human closeness that crosses countries, accents, and professional journeys.

That translates into technical and human support, spaces for learning, continuous feedback, collaboration among developers across LATAM, and one powerful belief: people do not only need challenging projects; they also need to feel valued, heard, and part of something larger than their backlog.

Building the Future Also Means Building Community

The home office is not just a desk because the future of technical work is not defined by where we code, but by the quality of the personal, cultural, and collaborative systems we design to think, create, and grow better. We are a generation of developers in LATAM building the future from our region, with technical rigor, community, continuous learning, and the certainty that global impact can also begin at home.

Careers Blog, Talent Spotlight

From Programming Curiosity to Tech Impact: Meet Randy Fonseca

Mismo thrives on the strength of its exceptional team. We provide top-tier remote software development teams that seamlessly integrate with companies worldwide, driving exceptional results. Many organizations have partnered with Mismo to augment their development capabilities and achieve their technology goals.

At the heart of these successful teams are the talented individuals who make Mismo what it is. We’re committed to celebrating our remarkable employees and their invaluable contributions to our company culture. Our employee spotlights showcase the genuine relationships we’ve forged with team members and clients, highlighting their dedication and the positive impact they have on our collaborative environment.

  • Tell us a little about yourself: Hello! I’m Randy. I live in a place called Rancho Redondo. I’d describe it as a semi-rural area, and since I’ve lived here my whole life, I’ve developed a deep appreciation for nature. I enjoy going on walks with my dog, visiting rivers, hiking, camping, and spending time at the beach.
    I also ride a motorcycle, which is another activity I really enjoy. I love discovering new roads and exploring different routes.
    I’m a huge football fan. I enjoy both watching and playing it. I usually play two to three times a week, and I also enjoy playing it as a video game.
    I like going out, but if I’m being honest, I often prefer staying at home, watching a movie or a series, and simply relaxing.


  • What initially attracted you to engineering and how have you found inspiration in this career? To be honest, choosing my career was mostly a matter of luck. I didn’t really know much about programming at first, but once I started learning, I discovered how much I enjoyed what I could create with it. In the end, it turned out to be a great decision.


  • What innovation or technical advancement have you been a part of that you consider to have made a milestone in your engineering field? I’d say the recent AI boom. I started using AI near the end of college, and I’ve been using it in my daily work ever since. 
  • How would you describe the work environment at Mismo? It’s a really positive environment. They care about you not only as an employee, but also as a person. My manager always asks how the client is treating me, and if I ever have any issues, they’re always willing to help. 
  • What learning and development opportunities have you had at Mismo and how have you utilized these opportunities to grow as a professional? I’ve had the opportunity to work with new technologies and tools. I feel that this helps me stay relevant in the job market and gives me a continuous learning experience. I’m always learning. 
  • What aspects of working at Mismo’s engineering team make you proud and motivate you in your daily tasks? For me, two of the most important things are being recognized for your work and receiving feedback on where you can improve. I’ve experienced both here.


  • How do you believe the company and engineering can positively impact the world, people’s lives, and make a difference in their respective industries? I value the work-life balance, the trust Mismo places in its people, the absence of micromanagement, and the employee benefits. These are some of the things I appreciate most about working here. 
  • What Mismo policies or practices have helped you improve your work-life balance? PTO Policy 
  • What inspiring advice would you give to someone considering a career in engineering or looking to join a company like Mismo? You can grow here. You’ll be challenged, but you’ll also be supported along the way. 
  • What tools or technologies do you use most frequently in your daily work as an engineer at Mismo? TypeScript, C#, .NET, Node.js, MongoDB, SQL, Vue.js, and Angular.

 

Careers Blog, Engineering

The Best Developers Don’t Just Write Code—They Learn How to Take Care of Themselves

Beyond Code: The Challenge Redefining Modern Software Engineering

For years, the tech industry celebrated a narrative that seemed unquestionable: the best engineers were those who were always available, responded to messages at any hour, and could sustain intense workloads for extended periods of time. It was a culture that equated commitment with sacrifice and productivity with long working hours.

For a while, that formula appeared to work. Products grew, startups scaled, companies accelerated innovation, and engineering teams consistently delivered increasingly ambitious goals. Yet behind those results, a reality emerged that no technology organization can afford to ignore today: the burnout of the people who make innovation possible.

More engineering leaders, CTOs, and technology executives are realizing that the real challenge is no longer just building better products. The challenge is building engineering teams capable of sustaining excellence over the long term without sacrificing well-being, creativity, or motivation.

Conversations around mental health and workplace well-being are no longer topics reserved for Human Resources. Today, they are part of business strategy, innovation capacity, and the foundation of high-performing engineering organizations.

The True Value of Software Engineering

When we think about software engineering, we often focus on complex architectures, artificial intelligence, scalable platforms, automation, and emerging technologies. Yet the true value of this profession goes far beyond the tools we use every day.

Engineering exists to solve real-world problems. Behind every application, platform, or system are people working to simplify processes, improve experiences, and create meaningful impact. Every line of code represents an opportunity to build something that did not exist before.

That is why a software developer’s contribution cannot be measured solely by the number of features delivered or the speed at which tickets are closed. Their impact is also reflected in their ability to collaborate, learn, share knowledge, and contribute to the collective growth of an engineering team.

When engineers find purpose in what they build, the quality of their work changes. Innovation stops being a task and becomes a natural outcome of being connected to a larger mission.

Well-Being as a Competitive Advantage

For decades, technology companies measured success primarily through speed and efficiency. Metrics such as Lead Time, Deployment Frequency, Cycle Time, and delivery velocity remain essential indicators of engineering performance.

However, the most mature organizations are introducing a new variable into the conversation: talent sustainability.

They understand that no product roadmap can be executed successfully if the people responsible for delivering it are exhausted, disengaged, or experiencing chronic stress.

Well-being does not mean lowering expectations or reducing accountability. It means creating the conditions that allow people to perform at a high level for years—not just for a few months.

A well-rested engineer makes better decisions, identifies risks more effectively, communicates more clearly, and brings more creative solutions to business challenges.

In an increasingly competitive market, caring for engineering teams is no longer a complementary initiative. It has become a strategic advantage that directly impacts productivity, retention, innovation, and long-term business outcomes.

Remote Work: An Extraordinary Opportunity with New Challenges

The global expansion of remote work has permanently transformed how software engineering teams are built.

Today, talented professionals can collaborate with companies around the world without leaving their cities, families, or communities behind.

For tech talent in Latin America, this shift has created unprecedented opportunities. Software engineers from Colombia, Costa Rica, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, and many other countries are contributing to global products, working alongside international teams, and helping build technology used by millions of people.

At the same time, this new model has introduced challenges that did not previously exist at the same scale.

The line between work and personal life has become increasingly blurred. Meetings span multiple time zones. Notifications seem endless. And for many professionals, the office now exists in the same space where they are expected to rest and recharge.

That is why successful remote engineering teams depend on more than collaboration tools and productivity platforms. They require healthy habits, sustainable boundaries, and organizational cultures that genuinely respect the well-being of their people.

LATAM Talent Is Redefining Global Technology

Over the last few years, the growth of nearshore software development has transformed how global companies view technology talent across Latin America.

What was once considered an operational alternative has become a strategic advantage for organizations seeking highly skilled, culturally aligned, and collaborative engineering teams.

Global companies have discovered something that those of us in the region have known for years: Latin America is home to exceptional technology talent.

Engineers across the region bring strong technical foundations, adaptability, critical thinking, and an extraordinary commitment to continuous learning.

Yet the true strength of LATAM talent extends beyond technical expertise.

Resilience, creativity in solving complex challenges, and the ability to thrive in multicultural environments have positioned Latin America as one of the most important technology hubs in the world.

Today, thousands of software developers, AI engineers, architects, and technical leaders across the region contribute to artificial intelligence initiatives, SaaS platforms, fintech solutions, healthtech products, and mission-critical enterprise systems.

The conversation is no longer about whether Latin America can compete globally.

The reality is that it already does.

Community as a Catalyst for Professional Growth

The strongest engineering careers are rarely built in isolation.

Behind every professional who reaches a new technical level is usually a network of people who contributed to that growth along the way.

Pair programming sessions, code reviews, mentorship relationships, informal technical discussions, and knowledge-sharing spaces create an impact that extends far beyond solving immediate problems.

They strengthen learning cultures and accelerate professional development.

The best engineering organizations understand that knowledge should never be concentrated in a handful of experts. Instead, they create environments where sharing experiences and insights is a natural part of everyday work.

When learning flows freely, the entire organization becomes stronger.

The real competitive advantage of a developer community is not simply its technical expertise. It is its collective ability to grow, adapt, and evolve alongside an industry that never stops changing.

Human-Centered Technical Leadership

Technology evolves rapidly, but the foundations of great leadership remain deeply human.

The best technical leaders are not only those who understand complex architectures or stay ahead of industry trends.

They are the ones who know how to listen, build trust, and create environments where people can grow with confidence.

They understand that behind every sprint, release, roadmap, and project are human beings with aspirations, challenges, and personal goals.

The most successful engineering teams often share one common characteristic: leaders who genuinely care about the growth of their people.

They provide context, encourage collaboration, remove obstacles, and help individuals discover opportunities to evolve both professionally and personally.

When people feel heard, valued, and supported, their commitment to the team and its outcomes increases dramatically.

Trust becomes one of the most powerful tools for driving innovation.

What We’re Learning at Mismo

At Mismo, we have the privilege of working alongside talented software engineers throughout Latin America who collaborate every day with innovative global companies.

Through that experience, we have learned that the most successful teams are not always the ones with the largest budgets or the most advanced technologies.

The teams that create the greatest impact often share a culture rooted in collaboration, continuous learning, and respect for people.

They are environments where technical growth and personal growth happen in parallel.

We believe that building a strong technology community means much more than connecting professionals with career opportunities.

It means creating spaces where developers can exchange knowledge, develop new skills, feel heard, and become part of something larger than a single project.

That vision has allowed us to build meaningful relationships across the region while proving that world-class software development can coexist with the human connection that defines our community.

The Future Belongs to Those Who Build Sustainable Technology

The next decade will bring extraordinary advances in artificial intelligence, automation, AI engineering, and new approaches to software development.

Yet even in a future defined by rapid technological acceleration, one element will remain impossible to replace: people.

Creativity, judgment, empathy, and the ability to solve complex problems continue to be deeply human capabilities.

These are the qualities that transform technology into solutions that create real impact.

Perhaps the most important question for technology leaders, software development companies, and engineering professionals is no longer simply how to build better products.

The real question is how to build better environments for the people who create them.

Because the future of software engineering will not be determined solely by new tools, frameworks, or technologies.

It will depend on our ability to build stronger communities, more human-centered cultures, and more sustainable careers.

And in that future, LATAM talent will play a critical role.

We are a generation of software developers, engineers, and technology leaders proving that technical excellence and well-being can advance together.

We are building global products, driving innovation, strengthening distributed engineering teams, and shaping a future where sustainable success is not an exception—it is the standard.

Careers Blog, Talent Spotlight

Matías Marenchino: Where AI Becomes Impact

Mismo thrives on the strength of its exceptional team. We provide top-tier remote software development teams that seamlessly integrate with companies worldwide, driving exceptional results. Many organizations have partnered with Mismo to augment their development capabilities and achieve their technology goals.

At the heart of these successful teams are the talented individuals who make Mismo what it is. We’re committed to celebrating our remarkable employees and their invaluable contributions to our company culture. Our employee spotlights showcase the genuine relationships we’ve forged with team members and clients, highlighting their dedication and the positive impact they have on our collaborative environment.

 

  • Tell us a little about yourself: Hi, I’m Matias. I’m originally from Córdoba, Argentina, and I’ve been part of Mismo for almost five years. As an MLOps Engineer, my primary focus is supporting our data scientists and helping them seamlessly deploy their machine learning models into production. Outside of work, I’m the proud parent of two wonderful kids, and I enjoy spending my free time playing padel.
  • What initially attracted you to engineering and how have you found inspiration in this career? My journey into engineering actually began with a passion for mathematics. While studying math, I took a Numerical Analysis course that involved programming, and I quickly discovered how much I enjoyed it. That experience sparked my interest in engineering, and today, I find inspiration in the simple yet powerful ability to use technology to solve complex, real-world problems.

  • What innovation or technical advancement have you been a part of that you consider to have made a milestone in your engineering field? One of the milestones I’m most proud of has been designing and implementing robust pipelines that bring machine learning models into production. These models are often developed by data scientists who are exceptionally skilled in their field but may not have extensive software engineering experience. Building the infrastructure that transforms their work into stable, scalable, production-ready services is both a rewarding technical challenge and a meaningful way to create real-world impact.
  • What made you choose Mismo? I was originally drawn to Mismo because of its fantastic atmosphere. It’s a place filled with warm, welcoming people who are always genuinely willing to support one another and help wherever they can.
  • How would you describe the work environment at Mismo? With 20 years of professional experience, I can honestly say that Mismo has the best work environment I have ever been a part of.
  • What learning and development opportunities have you had at Mismo and how have you utilized these opportunities to grow as a professional? I have always been a highly self-taught person, so rather than relying primarily on formal training resources, my greatest learning opportunity at Mismo has been my team. The collaborative environment allows me to continuously learn from my peers and grow professionally by working through day-to-day challenges together.
  • What aspects of working at Mismo’s engineering team make you proud and motivate you in your daily tasks? What makes me most proud and keeps me motivated every day is the team’s unwavering willingness to support one another. Knowing that I have such a supportive group behind me makes all the difference in my day-to-day work.
  • How do you believe the company and engineering can positively impact the world, people’s lives, and make a difference in their respective industries? Engineering certainly has the power to make a positive impact on the world, although the extent of that impact depends greatly on the projects we choose to pursue. Especially today, with the rapid advancement of AI and the uncertainty surrounding where these technologies may lead, it is essential that we focus on building responsible, reliable solutions that serve a meaningful and practical purpose.
  • What Mismo policies or practices have helped you improve your work-life balance? Since I work primarily as a contractor, my work-life balance is largely influenced by the specific projects and expectations set by each client. However, Mismo’s supportive environment and understanding of this dynamic help me navigate those requirements effectively while maintaining a healthy balance.
  • What inspiring advice would you give to someone considering a career in engineering or looking to join a company like Mismo? My advice is simple but essential: study hard, work hard, and always be willing to help your colleagues. Technical skills may open doors, but teamwork and mutual support are what build a successful, meaningful, and fulfilling career over the long term.

  • What tools or technologies do you use most frequently in your daily work as an engineer at Mismo? My day-to-day work revolves heavily around Python development. To orchestrate and manage data workflows, I regularly use tools such as Airflow, Snowflake, and Databricks. More recently, we have also begun leveraging AI tools like Claude and Gemini to enhance our workflows and improve productivity.